|
Friday, 28 October 2016
quote [ In their experiment, computers were able to make their own form of encryption using machine learning, without being taught specific cryptographic algorithms. The encryption was very basic, especially compared to our current human-designed systems. ]
I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords.
|
Comments
 |
arrowhen said @ 9:55pm GMT on 28th Oct
[Score:1 Funny]
They're probably using it to tell encrypted dick jokes.
|
|
shiftace said @ 11:00pm GMT on 28th Oct
The encrypted messages the AI are sending are only 16 bits long. Must be a short dick joke.
|
|
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 9:30pm GMT on 28th Oct
I don't think I've seen this before. This is a repost of an article that was posted to fix the fact that its original post was a repost
|
|
buckaroo50 said[1] @ 9:36pm GMT on 28th Oct
[Score:1 Informative]
I searched for "encrypt" and "neural" and didn't come up with anything. The paper was also just submitted 7 days ago.
On looking back on the article though, while I found the subject and its ramifications interesting (combined with steganography, AIs existing and communicating without our knowledge in languages they invent), the article and actual accomplishment aren't that interesting. I mostly wanted to get my support on record ;) |
|
shiftace said[1] @ 10:57pm GMT on 28th Oct
.
|
|
midden said @ 12:34am GMT on 29th Oct
Yeah, and it's the possible boot-strapping of more and more advanced systems, none of which any human actually understands that I find so interesting. It reminds me of the evolved radio antenna designs that work remarkably well, but we don't really understand why.
https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub-archive/1145h/1145%20(Globus).pdf |
|
Ankylosaur said @ 9:31pm GMT on 28th Oct
The Hash Writing of the Singularity Generation
|
|
donnie said @ 9:42pm GMT on 28th Oct
...the singularity forming in the minds of the hash generation
|
|
damnit said[1] @ 11:00pm GMT on 28th Oct
I for one welcome cat-based encryption.
|
|
Morris Forgot his Password said @ 1:40am GMT on 29th Oct
Is this different from the post a few doors down?
|
|
shiftace said @ 4:32am GMT on 29th Oct
nope.
|
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
