|
Thursday, 24 December 2015
quote [ His style is unmistakable, and nearly as striking as his subject matter: Clean vector graphics, gradient colors, blank and ominous backgrounds. Seedfeeder has written that he was inspired by airline safety manuals, with which he shares a kind of calming sterility. Instead of inflating their life preservers during an emergency landing, Seedfeeder's placid crash-test dummies are engaged in coitus, but the point is the same: Airline brochures and the Wikipedia articles Seedfeeder chooses to illustrate are both here to teach you about what it's like when you get fucked. ]
Got here from the amazing "snowballing" illustration.
|
Comments
 |
biblebeltdrunk said @ 6:31am GMT on 24th Dec
[Score:1 Insightful]
http://www.sensibleendowment.com/entry.php/945
|
|
HoZay said @ 7:42am GMT on 24th Dec
Yes, it's a repost.
|
|
satanspenis666 said @ 4:00pm GMT on 24th Dec
But classy pron reposts never get modded down.
|
|
sanepride said[1] @ 4:33pm GMT on 24th Dec
Too bad we don't get many true classy pron posts around here. I'd point out that this post is labelled SFW (funny how many posts are tagged NSFW that have no actual NSFW content whatsoever). Also, these illustrations don't exactly warrant the attention and admiration they've garnered. Seems pretty clear they're likely just photos converted to vector illustrations. Granted they function as informative illustrations, but they don't exactly rise to the level of the hairy hippy renderings from 'Joy of Sex'.
|
|
rylex said @ 9:32pm GMT on 24th Dec
Oh geez... I haven't thought about that book in years.
There needs to be a new Hipster version of "The Joy of Sex" for all the millenials. Skinny jeans would be draped over chairs instead of bell bottoms, guys would still be heavily bearded but girls would be waxed. Hmmmm... I think I'm gonna go get started on this project |
|
Bob Denver said @ 1:34am GMT on 25th Dec
In my defence, I was given an "Illegal Pr0n", back on SE Classic for a SFW post on Dustin Hoffman in Tootsie because it showed a pic of him in his prosthetic. If it even mentions sex, I post as NSFW because strange USA morals. I'd hate for anyone to get reprimanded or fired because of something I posted and, not living there, I can't be sure of what is deemed dangerously offensive.
|
|
sanepride said @ 2:11am GMT on 25th Dec
Hey I can appreciate the 'better safe than sorry' approach, mostly I'm just lamenting the lack of porn posts in general on SE 2.0 and the overall lack of enthusiasm for a former SE mainstay. But, as I've observed copiously, this isn't SE classic, and you probably don't have to worry too much about downmods around here.
|
|
Franger Sanger said @ 7:36am GMT on 24th Dec
I don't think the word "ominous" means what the author thinks it does... That gradient background is bland and sterile, but not ominous. It looks like a shitty Powerpoint template background, the type that Barry from accounting uses in his monthly report on sales figures. Mind you, if Barry said, "Here's the projections for next quarter," and Seedfeeder's pegging pic came up, a feeling of doom might be warranted.
|
|
cb361 said @ 2:06pm GMT on 24th Dec
Ah, Barry. It's always the quiet ones...
|
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
