Wednesday, 27 March 2019
quote [ The idea of critics or activists challenging researchers and seeking to hold science to account isn’t new. Most researchers say they are happy to engage in discussion. But with social media, email and internet now accessible from almost every home, mass communication gives online activists a voice with unprecedented power. In the field of CFS/ME research, it’s often personal. Those at the centre of it say it’s gotten out of control. ]
About spiralling opinions and people's troubles to grasp new-age illnesses.
|
rylex said @ 11:03pm GMT on 27th Mar
[Score:1 Good]
appreciate your content you been keeping the site alive with
|
Paracetamol said @ 6:47am GMT on 28th Mar
Thanks! Suppose it will only last SE for so long due to not being pornographic…
|
lilmookieesquire said @ 3:31am GMT on 28th Mar
Yes, but has everyone considered that all scientists are witches and should be burned at the stake? -comments section
|
arrowhen said @ 5:05am GMT on 28th Mar
Who are you, who are so wise in the ways of science?
|
ceallach said @ 3:59am GMT on 29th Mar
This is actually about how the "graded exercise" approach to CFS/ME improved things for 5-7% of participants and actually worsened things for 20% of participants. The article is either extremely biased or is trash journalism trolling for clicks.
|
Nobel winner James Watson said @ 11:48am GMT on 28th Mar
[Score:-1 Boring]
filtered comment under your threshold |