Tuesday, 7 May 2019

"Solar" Energy at Night

quote [ We experimentally demonstrate electric power generation from the coldness of the universe directly, using the negative illumination effect when an infrared semiconductor diode faces the sky. The results here point to a pathway towards night-time power generation. ]

Power generation from the darkness of the night sky. Only 4 watts per square meter, but interesting.
[SFW] [science & technology] [+5 Interesting]
[by buckaroo50@7:36pmGMT]

Comments

donnie said @ 9:40pm GMT on 7th May [Score:2]
Mercury cadmium telluride diode... breaks all the ROHS rules and then some! And all for 4W/m^2.

For perspective, a typical (non-orbital/space/crazy-exotic) terrestrial solar panel can generate 200 to 250W/m^2 in typical mid-latitude daylight conditions. Assuming this generator worked for 8h overnight it would produce the same amount of power as the same area of solar cells would in about seven minutes in daylight. And the night time generator is a theoretical maximum while the daytime one is an achievable, long-term practical reality.

Now consider that you have 500m^2 of space to do something with - which would you choose to occupy that space? For this to be sensible it would need to swap spots with the daytime solar cell during the night - some kind of automated system that would flip over the thing to the night side, etc. Consider the cost of adding night-time functionality to a daytime solar generation system - and for what, an extra 1% in total output? It doesn't even make sense. This is a curiosity, nothing more.
backSLIDER said @ 4:10am GMT on 8th May
I saw 4w and I thought "well maybe that is what they have now..." This isn't enough power to flip solar panels over. Maybe we can use this in space? Like on the backside of the moon? But I think a mirror bounce would be better.
5th Earth said @ 4:09pm GMT on 8th May
Yeah, nobody is billing as a replacement for solar, but it's an interesting invention and probably has applications for space work.
donnie said @ 8:54pm GMT on 13th May
Possibly for space. At 4AU or thereabouts the intensity of the sun drops to about 4W/m^2, so if you were far from the sun, on that order, and this thing still works pointing into deep space, then it would be a more viable option than a solar cell beyond a certain distance from a star.

Still, it would be big... and heavy. There you'd be competing with something like an Am231 RTG, which could give you ~4W for a couple hundred years in a package of a few kg.
perezoso said @ 2:32am GMT on 8th May [Score:1 Underrated]
Wow. "Fast Fourier Transform". I haven't seen that phrase since the days of running the SETI@Home app ... in like 2000?
donnie said @ 12:34am GMT on 10th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Science and engineering haven't forgotten the venerable FFT - it remains a ubiquitous staple in the signal processing toolbox across countless disciplines.

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur