midden said @ 4:48am GMT on 23rd February
An important statistic that they failed to mention is how many of the other 7398 people who did not self report as gluten-free also had elevated levels of arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and dimethylarsinic acid. midden said @ 4:52am GMT on 23rd February
An important statistic that they failed to mention is how many of the other 7398 people who did not self report as gluten-free also had elevated levels of arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and dimethylarsinic acid.
I'm sure the original research paper did include that information, but it's poor science writing on PBS/NOVA's part. I'm surprised. The article they got it from on Ars Technica at least included the following:
"Compared with those who ate gluten, the gluten-free participants had nearly double the total amount of arsenic compounds in their urine. Their blood had around 60 percent more total mercury compounds."
I'm sure the original research paper did include that information, but it's poor science writing on PBS/NOVA's part. I'm surprised. The article they got it from on Ars Technica at least included the following:
"Compared with those who ate gluten, the gluten-free participants had nearly double the total amount of arsenic compounds in their urine. Their blood had around 60 percent more total mercury compounds."
I'm sure the original research paper did include that information, but it's poor science writing on PBS/NOVA's part. I'm surprised. The article they got it from on Ars Technica at least included the following:
"Compared with those who ate gluten, the gluten-free participants had nearly double the total amount of arsenic compounds in their urine. Their blood had around 60 percent more total mercury compounds."