|
Friday, 22 January 2021
quote [ Link feature thingy, doesn't play well. ]
With the ABC. or us it those amp.
An article regarding Google-forcation.
|
Comments
 |
endopol said[1] @ 4:55pm GMT on 22nd Jan
Would/could/should the Australian law apply to SE as well?
|
|
the circus said @ 8:38pm GMT on 22nd Jan
I don't think SE counts as a digital giant. Is it even for-profit?
|
|
steele said @ 9:12pm GMT on 22nd Jan
[Score:1 Funsightful]
I like to think of it as a historical internet landmark. Y'all pay me about $5 a day to keep the place clean, but it's not filed with the IRS as a corp or anything.
|
|
von_sanchez said @ 10:08pm GMT on 22nd Jan
Honestly both horses in this race stink - this government primarily does what Murdoch's News Limited wants - but I'd welcome Google leaving Australia and getting replaced by a local as long as News didn't own it. It's been ages since the Australian government has done anything to develop the tech industry.
|
|
captainstubing said @ 12:00pm GMT on 23rd Jan
"...but I'd welcome Google leaving Australia and getting replaced by a local as long as News didn't own it" And there's the rub.
Can't help but feel that this is more about arranging money for media backers. If they were serious they could arrange for Google to simply not index their sites. Google might come to the party on that one. |
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
