Monday, 4 March 2019
quote [ WWF operated like a “global spymaster”, organising, financing and running networks of “informants”, to provide park authorities with intelligence, while publicly denying working with informants ]
WWF accused of funding guards who 'tortured and killed scores of people form the Guardian.
|
rndmnmbr said @ 8:47pm GMT on 4th Mar
[Score:1 Funny]
My first response was "Yeah, I can see Vince McMahon doing some real shady shit- wait, wait wait wait, hang on. Whoa. Wait."
|
LacheChance said @ 3:18pm GMT on 5th Mar
[Score:2 Funny]
Thank you for trying to lighten up this thread
|
rndmnmbr said @ 5:16am GMT on 6th Mar
Bah'gawd someone stop the damned match!
|
biblebeltdrunk said @ 2:07am GMT on 5th Mar
Vince may be desperate due to AEW but I don't think its this bad.
|
Headlessfriar said @ 6:35pm GMT on 4th Mar
I know I realized that Greenpeace was garbage when they attacked fields growing golden rice. What pro environmental groups are there that aren’t shady at this point?
|
Headlessfriar said @ 1:25pm GMT on 5th Mar
[Score:1 Underrated]
Wow, a flamebait mod because I don't like Greenpeace? Sorry, they're not in PETA levels of crazy, but they don't stand for everything they should. Golden rice was created to solve a real problem of people dying from lack of beta carotene. Anti GMO terrorist firebombing laboratory farms because they're scared of it is not something to be proud of. This isn't roundup ready crops, this is adding vitamins to crops where malnutrition exists. This isn't profit driven genetic engineering, it's science trying to make the world better. Go fuck your phobias.
|
foobar said @ 5:26am GMT on 6th Mar
What difference does it make if they're indigenous, and what does that even mean in Africa?
How exactly did people think they were protecting the crazy valuable endangered wildlife from the desperately poor people right next to them? |
biblebeltdrunk said @ 4:02pm GMT on 6th Mar
Observations on the State of Indigenous Human Rights in Cameroon
Indigenous is used in the Congo constitution but is not defined, and use at a local level can very across the country. It is understood to primarily refer to the Baka, Bakola, Bagyeli, and Bedzang, but not Mbororo. Pygmy is a separate term that further complicates this. “Marginal populations” is not a perfect umbrella term but it is one of the better ones. The absence of an institutional definition of the concept of Indigenous Peoples is a major issue, considering it is used for government directives and laws. WWF has been arguing money form local park tourism can offset short term money from poaching. At the same time they have been arguing that aboriginal people will benefit from parks on their land as it will strengthen and conserve the ecosystem in the larger area. However they have overlooked the racism in this area between the groups they have been funding and other local community, and overlooking violence. Their Advocating against Land Rights seemed particularly concerning because they are targeting groups who's benefactors have been ineffective due to wwfs image. |
biblebeltdrunk said @ 4:08pm GMT on 6th Mar
Or at least thats my understanding as an outsider after reading on it. I would like more opinions from experts on this if anyone has them.
|
Survival international has been stonewalling the new Messok Dja National Park due to concerns over the Baka people losing land. This is not going to be good for that process.